Newsletter : 8fax0604.txt
| Previous file
| Next file
>JN June 4, 1998, Vol. 6, No. 101
U.S. May Discontinue its Mediation
By Al Pessin (VOA-Jerusalem)
Ambassador to Israel Ned Walker says the United States will decide
in the next several days whether to continue its Middle East
mediation effort. Walker told reporters there is no firm date
for the decision, but he said the timeframe is "very short...days
rather than weeks."
"What's going to happen is that there will be a decision made as to
whether it's fruitful to continue or not. In other words, whether
there is going to be an agreement or not. It depends on how the
US officials have been saying for a month that they are close to
declaring a deadlock in the Israeli-Palestinian talks. That would
be widely seen as implicitly criticizing Israel, because it has not
accepted the US compromise plan and the Palestinians have.
But President Clinton has repeatedly delayed making such a
declaration to give Israel more time. Now, Walker appears to be
confirming press reports that there is a new US deadline of
sometime next week.
Should U.S. Aid to Israel Continue?
By Patricia Golan (VOA-Jerusalem)
At roughly $3 billion a year, United States aid to Israel is the
largest single component of America's foreign aid budget. But with
today's thriving economy in Israel, Americans and Israelis are
asking if the big aid package is still necessary?
There were years in Israel's 50-year history when American
assistance was crucial to keeping the country from economic ruin.
But those times -- and the Israeli economy -- have changed.
Foreign investment in Israel continues to break records. It's
tripled in just the past year alone, in spite of the continuing
uncertain political situation, and the fact that the peace process
with the Palestinians seems hopelessly stuck, and with the
recession and rising unemployment.
To some outsiders, it is bewildering that things are so good when
they're so bad. So what is going on here? Dan Propper is head
of the Israeli Manufacturers' Association. He attributes the
investment to Israel's generally favorable economy.
"Of course the peace process, everyone would have loved to see a
much quicker one. But as long as the peace process is going on --
and even if it's in a kind of a slow down -- the total environment
of doing business in Israel is positive."
Propper attributes this growth to such things as the end of the
Arab boycott, the privatization of state enterprises and Israel's
amazingly successful high-tech industry.
At present, Israel gets about $1 billion annually in civilian aid
and almost $2 billion in military aid. But with average Israeli
earnings on a par with that of many Western European countries, the
question being asked more and more these days is why should Israel
continue to get such big handouts from "Uncle Sam?"
Earlier this year, Israeli Finance Minister Yaacov Ne'eman actually
went to Washington, proposing a phase-out of US civilian aid over
the next decade. But recent Israeli news reports say more US
military aid may be on the way. To date, Israel has been required
to spend three quarters of all military aid money on American-made
military hardware. Under the deal, Israel will also reportedly be
allowed to spend more than it currently does with Israeli-based
Hebrew University economist David Lev-Hari says Israel can easily
wean itself from that money. But giving up the larger military aid
package is another matter. Lev-Hari points out that the military
aid is considered a grant -- while the civilian part is a loan.
"As far as loans, we can also take loans on the international money
market, the difference being mainly the rate of interest so I don't
think there's going to be major effect of gradual reduction of the
But will reducing aid lessen America's political leverage on
Israel? During the administration of President George Bush, the
US government withheld $10 billion in loan guarantees to help new
immigrants because it was displeased with then-Prime Minister
Yitzhak Shamir's settlement policies -- guarantees that were
eventually granted to Israel under Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin.
While analysts say there was no real long-term economic
consequence of this action, it did have some political impact. It
was a factor that forced Shamir to go to Madrid for the first
Middle East peace conference.
(All material on these web pages is © 2001-2012
by Electronic World Communications, Inc.)