Newsletter : 5fax0427.txt
| Previous file
| Next file
Publisher\Editor Don Canaan
April 27, 1995, V3, #78
All the News the Big Guys Missed
For subscriptions or back issues, please contact POL management
Shahak: Islamic Jihad Threatens to Kill Palestinian Leaders
IDF Chief of Staff Lt. General Amnon Shahak told the Knesset
a threat from Syria still exists. Shahak also said the Islamic
Jihad recently warned the Palestinian Authority that they intend to
assassinate its leaders. He said that the warning explains why the
Authority is taking a tougher line against the Islamic Jihad as
compared to Hamas.
Anniversary Today Commemorates Liberation of Bergen-Belsen
By Evans Hays (Bergen-Belsen)
Hundreds of people are gathering in the small, north German town of
Bergen-Belsen for this week's commemoration of the day 50 years ago
that Allied troops liberated the Nazi concentration camp here. The
actual liberation, by British forces, came on April 15, 1945, but
officials are commemorating the date two weeks late in line with
other ceremonies taking place across Germany.
The commemorations began earlier this year at the Nazi death camps
liberated by Allied forces. The ceremonies have been a tribute to
those who were killed and to those who survived.
Survivors and their families are now gathering in Bergen-Belsen, a
former Nazi concentration camp not far from the northern German
industrial city of Hanover.
More than 100,000 prisoners died here, including tens of thousands
of Jews, Soviet war prisoners and others. Anne Frank, the girl who
hid from the Nazis in Amsterdam, and whose diary became a legend
The camp is now a memorial, tucked neatly into the northern German
landscape of pine trees and heather fields. On the site, there is
a museum dedicated to the Holocaust.
Some camp survivors have said Bergen-Belsen is too clean now to
provide the proper memories of a horror that ended 50 years ago.
But that has not kept them from returning.
Other guests on hand for the commemoration ceremonies include
German President Roman Herzog and the head of Germany's Jewish
community, Ignatz Bubis.
Supreme Court Hears Columbus KKK Case
By Jane Berger (Washington)
The Supreme Court has heard oral arguments in an important
religious case from Ohio. The court decision's could further
clarify the constitutional boundaries for religious speech and
religious displays on public property.
For many years, Ohio every December has permitted the display of
a large Christmas tree and a large Chanukah menorah in a public
square in front of the state Capitol Building in Columbus.
In December of 1993, the state barred the Ku Klux Klan from
erecting a huge cross along with the other displays in the square.
The state said the cross was a purely religious symbol, and
therefore would violate the constitutional requirement to separate
church from state.
There was no mention in legal arguments that the Klan has always
used the cross historically to symbolize its strong political
opposition to African-Americans, Jews, and other members of
The Klan sought and received an injunction from a federal district
court to allow the cross to remain. The court's decision said any
reasonable observer would conclude that the government was
expressing its toleration of religious and secular pluralism, and
not endorsing religion. A federal appeals court agreed with that
decision, and the state then appealed the case to the Supreme
Arguing on behalf of state, Attorney Mike Renner told the justices
that any purely religious symbol should be barred from government
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas -- the court's only
African-American -- was the only court member who questioned the
Klan's motives. Justice Thomas asked whether the Klan's cross was
a religious or a political symbol.
Speaking to reporters after the session was over, Ohio's Attorney
General Betty Montgomery said the Klan was attempting to use the
symbol of Christianity to knock down the constitution's wall of
separation between church and state.
"We argue that Ohio's obligation to enforce the First Amendment's
separation between church and state outweighs any right the Klan
has to post the ultimate symbol of Christianity at the seat of
state government. We think withholding official state endorsement
of any religious symbol strengthens all religions because the
practice of religion should be guided by the personal faith, not
Arguing in favor of the KKK, Attorney Benson Wolman of the American
Civil Liberties Union said Ohio had violated the Klan's right to
free speech by barring the display of a cross in a public place.
"My clients put forth their symbol for mixed reasons. They did it
partly because it was the holiday season, but probably more than
anything, because the state told them that the menorah could be up,
but not their cross. That's discrimination of the most rank
sort. And we believe that the State of Ohio simply developed a
new rule to fit the particular occasion."
Wolman said he is Jewish, and does not personally agree with the
political views of the Klan. But he said even though free speech
may at times be abhorrent, it is important to protect that
"We find that there is value in protecting their (the Klan's)
rights, because if you eliminate their rights, who is next? And if
they are off the fringe, then who's the next fringe that moves up?"
The Supreme Court has long struggled to define the boundaries
between freedom of speech, freedom of religion, and the requirement
to separate church and state. Each year during the Christmas
holidays, confusion reigns in local communities over what kind of
religious displays are allowed. Legal experts say the court
perhaps will issue some clear guidelines defining what is
permissible and what is not. A decision in the Ohio case is
expected by the end of June.
(All material on these web pages is © 2001-2012
by Electronic World Communications, Inc.)